Philippine Standard Time:

Tuesday, April 14, 2026 - 8:41 AM

  1. Home
  2. International Treaties
  3. CHRP Comments on the Concluding Observations of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against…

Joint Statement, Statements

Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Improving accountability and access to remedy for victims of business-related human rights abuse through State-based non-judicial mechanisms

38th session of the Human Rights Council

Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights: Improving accountability and access to remedy for victims of business-related human rights abuse through State-based non-judicial mechanisms

JOINT NHRI STATEMENT

25 June 2018

The NHRIs of Cameroon, Bolivia, Denmark, Ecuador, Germany, India, Ireland, Morocco, and the Philippines, representing the Working Group on Business and Human Rights of the Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions (GANHRI) welcome the report of the High Commissioner for Human Rights on improving accountability and access to remedy for victims of business-related human rights abuse through State-based non-judicial mechanisms. We also commend OHCHR’s Accountability and Remedy Project, which has helped States strengthen their implementation of the pillar on access to remedy in the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.

The mandate and role of National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs) in facilitating remedy, including as a State-based non-judicial mechanism, are identified explicitly in the UN Guiding Principles. NHRIs are instrumental in bridging and mediating concerns over human rights violations concerning businesses, such as, but not limited to, discrimination, labor rights, consumer rights and environmental rights violations. This also frames the relationship of NHRIs to other State-based mechanisms such as domestic courts and regional human rights courts. The bridging role of NHRIs is an important tool or mechanism by which concerns of business-related human rights violations are brought to the attention of these actors.

We remain concerned, however, by the failure or unwillingness of some States to promptly act on the findings and resolutions of NHRIs on human rights abuses involving transnational corporations and business enterprises. NHRIs are independent institutions playing vital roles in complementing, supporting, or drawing attention to States’ actions or policies affecting human rights.

We call on States to implement the recommendations of the ARP II to strengthen State-based non-judicial mechanisms. We call on States to develop national action plans for the implementation of the Guiding Principles with due attention to Pillar III of the Guiding Principles.

We remind States that NHRIs have the mandate to

  1. provide support and advice to government to identify whether relevant laws are aligned with their human rights obligations and are being effectively enforced;
  2. monitor, investigate into, and report on the impact of business activities on human rights;
  3. provide information and advise on how corporations operate its business with due regard to the potential impacts of their operations to human rights;
  4. assist victims of corporate abuses or victims of human rights violations by serving as bridge, facilitator and mediator between the State, rights-holders and business enterprises, as well as support victims’ access to justice, remedies and reparations;
  5. conduct research or documentation of good practices and challenges in relation to business and human rights, which will inform stakeholders and influence reforms towards application of rights-based legislation and policies on business and human rights.

For example the Commission on Human Rights of the Philippines is carrying out a national inquiry on climate change, which probes into the alleged responsibility of major fossil-fuel companies or so-called “carbon majors” to climate change and how this impacts human rights. The Commission is using its investigatory functions and is directly invoking the Guiding Principles in the case.

Keeping NHRIs independent, functional and accessible to all creates an enabling environment where NHRIs can facilitate dialogue among duty-bearers, rights-holders, business enterprises and civil society, and recommend access to justice, effective remedies and reparations for business-related human rights abuses.

We will be recommending the ARP II report recommendations to NHRIs in all regions, and look forward to promoting their implementation, in collaboration with all stakeholders at global and local levels alike.

Thank you.

Related Post

Other Stories

Statement of the Commission on Human Rights recommending for the continuation of the UN Joint Programme, noting its valuable impacts to the human rights situation in the Philippines The Commission on Human Rights (CHR) notes the gains that the United

The Commission on Human Rights (CHR) expresses deep concern over the alleged consecutive aerial bombings in the Cordillera region carried out by the military as part of its counter-insurgency operations against alleged members of the New Peoples’ Army (NPA). According

Brief Statement, Press Statement, Statements

Statement of CHR spokesperson, Atty. Jacqueline Ann de Guia, on the killing of Atty. Benjamin Ramos

The Commission on Human Rights continues to express concern on the continuing violence against human rights defenders in the country, with the killing of Atty. Benjamin Ramos as another addition to the growing incidents of injustices to be reported. We

The Commission on Human Rights (CHR) decries the brazen ambush of Ponciano Onia, president of the Abono Partylist, which advocates for Filipino farmers in the Congress. Onia, also an incumbent municipal councilor of Umingan town, Pangasinan was ruthlessly attacked and

OHCHR requested inputs to NHRIs on the situation and obstacles faced by women (and vulnerable and marginalized groups) in the Philippines to access the internet, and measures taken to bridge the gender digital divide in the country. CHRP inputs contributed

Civil society organisations’ (CSOs) participation in policy and budget processes is crucial in promoting transparency and accountability in the government. The Commission on Human Rights (CHR) backs the immediate passage of House Bill No. 7407 entitled “An Act Institutionalizing the