Philippine Standard Time:

Friday, June 20, 2025 - 5:24 AM

  1. Home
  2. Statements
  3. Brief Statement
  4. Press Statement of CHR Spokesperson, Atty Jacqueline Ann de Guia, on the Allegations of the…

Asia Pacific Regional Review of Implementation of the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration

10 to 12 March 2021, General debate (Agenda item 2, 10 March 2021)

Pleasant day to all. I am Gwendolyn Pimentel-Gana from the Commission on Human Rights of the Philippines, speaking on behalf of the Asia Pacific Forum of National Human Rights Institutions (APF).

The APF is a coalition of 25 National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs) from across the region.

The APF affirmed that NHRIs should “respond effectively and promptly to requests from other NHRIs to investigate violations of the human rights of their nationals present in a country that has a national institution”. That affirmation established the precedent for cross-border human rights cooperation amongst the APF membership in the broader area of migration.

While migration is a positive and rewarding experience for many migrants and their families, a significant number face serious challenges and violations of their human rights. This includes ill-treatment by immigration or law enforcement authorities, abusive working conditions, absence of basic workplace protections, limited access to social security, discrimination and wide-spread xenophobia. The pandemic and resulting government restrictions have exacerbated these situations.

We note the efforts of sending and receiving States during the pandemic such as providing shelters for stranded migrants, ensuring medical and financial assistance, and facilitating their repatriation. We do however raise our concern over the lack of support in accessing justice, further risks of trafficking for labor, and poor living conditions in quarantine facilities and shelters.

While governments continue to cite that certain rights can be restricted in the context of public emergencies, we caution against the application of these restrictions beyond the allowable parameters of human rights law—restrictions should always be legal, necessary, and proportionate. Any overreach may result to human rights violations.

NHRIs support and monitor the implementation of the GCM through:

  • Engaging in consultations with the aim of localizing its objectives;
  • Monitoring and assisting on cases of rights violations against migrants and their families;
  • Promoting awareness and positive narratives of the contributions of migrants and their families; and
  • Submitting reports to UN and regional human rights mechanisms, particularly the Treaty Bodies.
    But we also face challenges such as:
  • lack of appreciation of the value of human rights. Often we are viewed as adversaries. But we bridge partnerships between governments and civil society; and we provide advice on the implementation of States’ human rights obligations in the context of migration.

NHRIs are partners in the GCM implementation process and we look forward to continuing this engagement with all stakeholders. We would recommend that our role and contribution to the GCM implementation process be reflected throughout the regional review. We also call on States to inclusively engage with CSOs, trade unions, and NHRIs during the implementation of the GCM at the national level.

Thank you and God bless us all.

Related Post

Other Stories

A case conference was conducted by the Commission on Human Rights (CHR) on Wednesday, 27 October 2022, as part of its ongoing motu proprio independent investigation into the killing of broadcaster Percival “Percy Lapid” Mabasa. Roy Mabasa, brother of Percy,

18 November 2016 PRESS STATEMENT CHR STATEMENT ON THE BURIAL OF THE REMAINS OF FERDINAND E. MARCOS AT THE LIBINGAN NG MGA BAYANI He who lives the life of a thief, gets buried like a thief. They stole from the

I am saddened by the decision of the Supreme Court (SC) to oust Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno through a quo warranto petition. The 1987 Constitution is clear that a sitting Chief Justice can only be removed through impeachment. At

For the President to say that extrajudicial killings (EJKs) is his only sin means that he did not only acknowledge its existence but also recognize that it is wrong. Recognizing the existence of a wrong, which has cost thousands of

The Commission on Human Rights (CHR) welcomes the action of both houses of Congress to separately ratify on Monday, 23 May the bicameral conference committee report on the disagreeing provisions of Senate Bill (SB) 2209 and House Bill (HB) 10703

The Commission on Human Rights (CHR) recognises the equally pressing impact of the pandemic to the economy and how its effects inevitably lead to the discussion on employees’ welfare. We welcome the issuance of the Labor Advisory No. 1, s.2022