Philippine Standard Time:

  1. Home
  2. Statements
  3. Brief Statement
  4. Statement of CHR Spokesperson, Atty. Jacqueline de Guia, on the use of child soldiers by…

Press Statement, Statements

Statement of the Commission on Human Rights on the alleged mistreatment of a Filipino worker by PAOCC Spokesperson Winston Casio

The Commission Human Rights (CHR) expresses concern over the alleged mistreatment of a Filipino national committed by Presidential Anti-Organized Crime Commission (PAOCC) Spokesperson Winston Casio. The CHR Region III will launch its own investigation to address the matter, particularly on assessing any potential human rights violations that may have occurred.

In closed-circuit television (CCTV) footage currently circulating online, Mr. Casio is seen slapping a Filipino worker during the PAOCC raid on an alleged Philippine Offshore Gaming Operator (POGO) establishment in Bataan. In a memorandum issued by the PAOCC on 04 November 2024, Mr. Casio was relieved of his duties as PAOCC spokesperson pending the outcome of the investigation.

As a government official, Mr. Casio, along with all government personnel, are bound by the highest ethical standards of public service, as outlined in the Republic Act No. 6713 or the Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees.

While reports indicate that the man involved allegedly made an offensive gesture toward the PAOCC official, the Commission believes that such behaviour does not justify any form of physical retaliation from a public official.

The Civil Service Code of Ethics is unequivocal in its call for government employees to uphold respect, professionalism, and integrity in their actions, serving as both examples and protectors of the people they serve. Any act of aggression, regardless of circumstance, undermines the trust and erodes the essential connection between the government and the people.

We note the swift response of the PAOCC in addressing this incident. We believe that by promptly requiring Mr. Casio to provide an explanation and temporarily relieving him of his duties demonstrates the institution’s commitment to accountability, transparency, and the ethical conduct expected of a public office.

The CHR calls for a full and impartial investigation into the incident to ensure accountability and to reinforce the standards of conduct expected of public officials. We urge all public servants to commit to respecting the rights and dignity of all Filipinos, regardless of the situation, in adherence to the values enshrined in our Constitution and laws. ###

Related Post

Other Stories

(Trigger warning: Sexual assault, rape, murder, death) The Commission on Human Rights (CHR) in Region IV-A and VII are doing their independent and parallel investigation into the recent separate cases of rape of two minors in Lucena City, Quezon and

This is the statement of CHR spokesperson, Atty. Jacqueline Ann de Guia, on the government’s increasing efforts to pursue activists

The Commission on Human Rights (CHR) acknowledges the recent signals of openness from the Philippine government, specifically in cooperating with the United Nations (UN) system and human rights mechanisms in improving the human rights situation in the country. In light

The Commission on Human Rights joins in commemorating the 30th Anniversary of the International Day of Older Persons. The theme for this year’s dedicatory occasion is: “Pandemics: Do They Change How We Address Age and Ageing?”, which intends to raise

Dismissal on the basis of pregnancy is clearly prohibited under the Magna Carta of Women (MCW). The prohibition against dismissing students on the basis of pregnancy does not distinguish between public or private educational institutions. The CHR is alarmed with

Brief Statement, Press Statement, Statements

Statement of CHR spokesperson, Atty. Jacqueline Ann de Guia, on the arrest of Rappler CEO Maria Ressa

The Commission on Human Rights agrees that, in all cases, the rule of law must prevail. It is these same laws that ensure that each and every right is upheld and protected. As there are questions on the arrest of