Standard nga Oras sa Pilipinas:

Sunday, June 8, 2025 - 7:24 PM

  1. Balay
  2. Policy Advisory
  3. Human Rights Advisory on the Accepted and Noted Recommendations by the Philippines During the Third…

Statement of the Commission on Human Rights on the unilateral declaration by the President of the Philippines’s withdrawal from the Rome Statute

The need for justice and the rule of law to prevail amidst allegations of impunity cannot hide under the veil of threat to withdraw from the Rome Statute.

The Commission on Human Rights believes that if the Philippine government can ably demonstrate genuine respect for human rights, as well as working mechanisms that ensure that perpetrators are brought to justice and there is recourse for victims under our justice system, then international human rights bodies will find no reason to assume jurisdiction over what should otherwise be purely domestic affairs.

The Philippines has been at the forefront of advancing international justice. Declarations to withdraw from the International Criminal Court (ICC) constitute a step-back in our commitment to address impunity locally and elsewhere in the world.

The call for the Philippine government is to demonstrate good faith and cooperate in the processes of the ICC, including the current preliminary examination of allegations linked to the current administration’s campaign against illegal drugs. The rational thing for the government to do is to face the ICC squarely in the interest of respecting due process.

Regard for due process also includes accepting that withdrawal from the Rome Statute does not remove the jurisdiction of the Court on crimes alleged to have been committed during the time the Philippines is still a State Party (Article 127, Rome Statute).

Considering that the ICC is a ratified, binding instrument, Senate concurrence is also required in withdrawing or terminating treaties. Hence, an unsigned statement of withdrawal from the President alone is not sufficient for such declaration to take effect.

Regardless of any treaty, the challenge for the government is to ensure that the human rights of every Filipino is respected and protected. We must resist any signs that suggest encouraging impunity and continue to demand accountability for every instance of human rights violations that threaten the core of our humanity. In the end, no one is and should be above the law. ■

 

DOWNLOAD FILE DINHI

May Kalabutan nga Post

Ubang mga Istorya

The Commission on Human Rights (CHR) has consistently endeavored to be collaborative and non-adversarial in the defense of human rights. In line with our mandate, we provide recommendations and advise to the government for the improvement of the human rights

The Commission on Human Rights (CHR) notes the decision of the International Criminal Court (ICC) to move the case of the Philippines forward to preliminary investigation. To recall, in 2020, the Office of the Prosecutor at the ICC, led by

The Commission on Human Rights welcomes the Senate Bill 2506 approved by the House of Representatives, which seeks to raise the social pension of poor senior citizens from ₱1000 to the current ₱500. Senate Bill 2530 was also adopted, which

Ang Commission on Human Rights (CHR) nagpahayag ug lawom nga kabalaka sa giingong mga tuig nga grabeng pag-abuso ug pagmaltrato nga giantos ni kasambahay Silvera 'Elvie' Vergara sa mga kamot sa iyang mga amo gikan sa Occidental Mindoro. Usa ka motu propio nga imbestigasyon base sa among

Six months have elapsed since the rape and alleged killing of 15-year old girl Fabel Pineda by police officers in Ilocos Sur, but justice remains elusive for her and her cousin Bernadette Saniatan despite the strong condemnation of the Philippine

The General Community Quarantine (GCQ) protocols require older persons (or those aged 60 years and above) “to remain in their residences at all times, except when indispensable under the circumstances for obtaining essential goods and services or for work in