필리핀 표준시:

Sunday, June 8, 2025 - 7:15 PM

  1. 정책 자문
  2. Human Rights Advisory on the Accepted and Noted Recommendations by the Philippines During the Third…

CHR 대변인인 Jacqueline Ann de Guia 변호사의 성명은 환경 및 천연자원부의 환경 보호 및 집행국 법안의 긴급 인증을 촉구하는 내용을 담고 있습니다.

The Commission on Human Rights (CHR) echoes its support for the urgent passage of the Environmental Protection and Enforcement Bureau (EPEB) Bill. In a previous statement, the CHR recognised the push of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) to better enforce environmental laws as a positive step in protecting the human rights of all Filipinos.

Recently, Joint Resolution No. 02 Series of 2021 was signed by the National Law Enforcement Coordinating Committee – Subcommittee on Environment and Natural Resources (NALECC-SCENR) and other participating agencies to the 4th National Environmental Law Enforcement Summit last 14-16 July 2021.

The said Joint Resolution emphasises that, despite numerous laws mandating the DENR to perform environmental protection and enforcement, the DENR does not have its own dedicated bureau to enforce environmental and natural resources laws that it is assigned with, resulting in weak implementation of these laws.

As such, CHR stresses that strengthening institutions to empower environmental rule of law is central to achieving sustainable development. There is a need to integrate environmental needs with the essential elements of the rule of law, and provide the basis for improving environmental governance.

CHR likewise supports capacitating environment law enforcers; improving legal and policy mechanisms to better
combat illegal transnational environmental activities; and addressing violations of environmental laws, among others, as embodied in the EPEB bill.

In the same vein, the CHR underscores that one of the most pressing concerns when we speak of environmental problems is the increasing number of fallen environmental rights defenders and law enforcers whose lives, liberties, and security were curtailed in the line of duty. This has been evident in the report that declared the Philippines as the deadliest country for land and environmental defenders.

We hope for the administration’s expedient certification of the proposed bill as urgent. This is to also ensure that guarantees and protection will be accorded to environmental frontliners against any attacks, harassments, and retaliation from violators and criminals; and that the legislation will genuinely contribute in mitigating the environmental degradation and biodiversity loss in the Philippines.

As the national human rights institution of the country, the Commission echoes the constitutionally-recognised right of every Filipino to a balanced and healthful ecology in accord with the rhythm and harmony of nature, while underscoring the State’s primary obligation to realise this right while facilitating justice for the victims of environmental and human rights violations. ###

관련 게시물

다른 이야기들

2017년 8월 31일 보도자료 CHR은 유엔 인권 옹호자 특별 보고관에 대한 두테르테 대통령의 발언에 우려를 표명 인권 위원회(CHR)는 로드리고 로아 두테르테 대통령이 유엔 사법 외, 요약 또는 기타 특별 보고관에 대해 욕설을 퍼부은 것에 대해 우려를 표명했습니다.

필리핀의 교도소와 구금 시설은 국내에서 가장 열악한 곳 중 하나입니다. 2020년 3월 기준, 교도소 관리 및 형벌국(BJMP)은 교도소 혼잡률이 5,34%에 달한다고 밝혔으며, 일부 수감자는

The Commission on Human Rights (CHR) welcomes the recent verdict by the Caloocan Court, which found four police officers guilty of homicide in connection with the 2016 killing of a father and his son during an anti-drug operation in Manila.

The Commission on Human Rights (CHR) expresses its grave concern after receiving reports that journalists were threatened by members of a demolition team while covering an incident at Sitio Balubad, Brgy. Anunas, Angeles City, Pampanga on 12 March 2024. CHR

In a previous statement, we have raised the sharp contrast with how the Philippine National Police (PNP) handles Senator Leila M de Lima during her attendance at court hearings compared to other high profile cases. A simple review of footages

The Commission on Human Rights (CHR) welcomes the recent pronouncement of the Supreme Court, per Office of the Court Administrator (OCA) Circular No. 106-2022, encouraging the exemption of deaf parties and their sign language interpreters from in-court hearings and, otherwise,